Solar District Heating: How to Tackle Land Use Issues

One way out of the competition dilemma is to combine heat generation and fruit and vegetable harvest. (Photo: Hamburg Institut Research)
One way out of the competition dilemma is to combine heat generation and fruit and vegetable harvest. (Photo: Hamburg Institut Research)

Usually, solar district heating (SDH) plants require large fields for collector installations, which has raised concerns at local level because of competing land uses and a system’s potential visual impact on the surroundings. One way out of this dilemma is to combine heat generation and fruit and vegetable harvest. As part of SDHp2m…From Policy to Market, a Horizon 2020 project, some regions are looking to create regulations based on best practice examples of land use or spatial heat planning. This article will present showcases from the Styria region in Austria, Hamburg in Germany and Valle d’Aosta in Italy (see also the attached fact sheets).

In the metropolitan region of Hamburg, several SDH projects have failed because of a lack of suitable areas or because they lost out against residential buildings, roads, nature habitats or industrial, agricultural or commercial facilities. The Hamburg Institut Research (HIR) is now developing best practice guidance and policy recommendations to tackle this barrier. It established five main categories:

  • large roof spaces
  • polluted or contaminated areas
  • zones along traffic routes
  • agricultural plots
  • double use for both SDH systems and nature conservation

In the second category, Hamburg shows large application potential in areas storing sewage from the Elbe river. For example, the fields covered in sludge at the port of Hamburg-Altenwerder (see the map below) could provide enough space for about 40,000 m² of solar collectors, with some challenges remaining, such as the lack of a nearby district heating network and a legal permit for SDH systems on these hills.

Satellite view of SDH plant in Varese, Italy (Photo: Google Maps)

Solar in spatial planning

In the Austrian region of Styria, almost all DH networks which require significant hot water amounts in summer are in urban areas, where land is quite expensive. Additionally, the owner of the property expects its value to rise, which usually leads to higher rental costs and sale prices and threatens the economic viability of SDH plants.

Together with Austrian-based research institute AEE INTEC and system supplier S.O.L.I.D., the regional government has been trying to rectify the situation by devising new policies which would allow the installation of SDH systems in agricultural priority areas and green zones. The first step has been to establish a broader consensus about the future need for energy supply mainly from local renewable sources, essentially by evaluating energy demand in spatial planning. There will be one pilot study each about three municipalities to analyse the situation.

Potential site for SDH plant on sludge fields at Hamburg-Altenwerder port in Germany (Photo: Google Maps)

You can’t compare our systems to PV installations: Italy

The case of Italy is a rather peculiar one, as the main competitor for land use is photovoltaics. The widespread and mostly unchecked deployment of large ground-mounted PV plants because of generous feed-in tariffs has prompted a quick and harsh response by many regional administrations, leading to stringent rules on new ground-mounted solar systems. Even though these requirements make no explicit mention of solar thermal collectors, the technology falls within their scope automatically.

To counter this unfortunate development, Ambiente Italia has been cooperating with the Valle d’Aosta region in northwest Italy and other local stakeholders, such as district heating utilities, to find a solution based on a multi-level approach: 

“We are different from PV”: SDH plants usually require a smaller piece of land and are placed in industrial and residential, not in heritage areas.
“We are different from Denmark”: Danish SDH systems typically have large fields of collectors thanks to a low population density and very inexpensive plots; In Italy, the average SDH plant size ranges from 1,000 to 2,500 m².
“We need a showcase”: An SDH system in operation would show all stakeholders that there is zero impact on the landscape, which is why a feasibility study on feeding solar energy into Aosta’s DH network has been underway.

What likewise proved to be very effective when interacting with local stakeholders has been to show them existing SDH plants via satellite images. The example above depicts the first and only SDH system in Italy, a 990 m² installation in Varese, north of Milano. The image highlights the small area that is occupied by the system compared to the space needed for residential districts, other facilities and the town itself.

Riccardo Battisti (


Similar Entries

The map shows the three existing SDH plants in Varese, Sansicario and Lodi (red circles). A fourth with a gross area of about 600 m² is expected to come online in 2020 to feed heat into Turin’s district network operated by the Iren Group utility (yellow cirle). (Source: Ambiente Italia)

Substantial solar resources and a generous incentive scheme called Conto Termico 2.0: Perfect conditions, it seems, for the widespread use of solar district heating. But barriers such as a low gas price and the concentration of district heating in a small part of Italy have so far limited deployment to a few installed systems.

What would the economic impact on a future energy system be if one were to unlock the full solar thermal potential in Austria, Denmark, Germany and Italy? According to a study conducted by Aalborg University as part of the IEA SHC Task 52 research project Solar Heat and Energy Economics in Urban Environments, exploiting the maximum potential will result in significant cost reductions if solar heat is supplied not individually but by district heating.

When it comes to district heating, Sweden has made the switch from fossil fuels to biomass and waste heat (see chart). As early as 2015, biomass provided 46 % of the energy in district heating networks across the country, followed by 24 % from waste incineration and 8 % from industrial excess heat. Fossil fuels came only to about 7 % of the around 175 petajoules, or PJ, produced in Sweden in 2015 (latest data available).

Housing developments, communities, local authorities and business parks looking to incorporate district heating schemes have access to a new specialist resource: Forest Fuels’ heat network specialist Edward Lewis. Edward – who has been a respected authority on biomass wood fuel heating for more than 10 years – has this month added certification as a CIBSE-approved Heat Network Consultant. This makes Edward just one of just a handful of consultants in the UK who have expertise in both biomass wood fuel and heat networks.